Shrewsbury based insolvency practitioners highlight a small victory for business directors over HMRC
22nd February 2012
... Comments

A Shrewsbury based insolvency practitioners has commented on a recent legal case and says there is evidence that Her Majesty's Revenue & Customes (HRMC) have been making greater use of their powers.

Graham Down, Director of Burton Sweet, said: "There is some – at least, anecdotal – evidence that HMRC have recently been making much greater use of their powers to make directors personally liable for the national insurance debts of their failed companies. The power derives from Section 121 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992, which allows HMRC to issue personal liability notices (PLNs) when a company has failed to pay NI contributions and that failure is “attributable to the fraud or neglect of one or more individuals who were, at the time of the fraud or neglect, officers of the company"."

Commenting on a recent case, Mr Down said: "Mr O’Rorke had been the finance director of a company called L Wear Limited, which went into administration in March 2007 owing HMRC £321,307 in unpaid NICs. HMRC duly issued a PLN against him, and he appealed the PLN claiming that he had been suffering from an addiction which affected his behaviour.

"In his defence he relied in part on the comments which had been made in the House of Lords during the passage of legislation, where Lord Haskel had said: “the investigation of each director’s responsibility will be carried out so that only those shown to have acted knowingly and deliberately will be penalised”. Mr O’Rorke claimed that this meant that it had been envisaged that a defence that a director did not know what he was doing (for example, because of incapacity caused by mental illness) could be used.

"The Tribunal noted that section 121 is contained within a part of the Social Security Administration Act which deals largely with criminal offences. It concluded that the purpose of the provision – to transfer a liability from the company as employer, to its officers – was a form of punishment. It decided that the context of the word “neglect” within the legislation reinforced its view that it was a penal provision, especially when used alongside the word “culpable”, and that under European human rights law the PLN provisions should be classified as criminal.

"Taking all those things together, the Tribunal found that the state of mind of the individual against whom the PLN forms an essential ingredient of assessing liability. A full transcript of the Tribunal’s decision can be found at BAILII. How wide the application of the decision will be, remains to be seen. For now though, let’s toast a small victory for the little man against the might of HMRC. We’re grateful to Reynolds Porter Chamberlain LLP for bringing this case to our attention."

Burton Sweet Corporate Recovery offer corporate recovery and insolvency advice, with an approach tailored to suit your specific needs. It can find a solution for your problems. Call them on 01743 233603 for more information.

About the Author

Catherine B

Member since: 12th June 2012

I am a PR and copywriting specialist and handle much of this work for the bestof Shrewsbury. I am passionate about living and working in Shrewsbury promoting the people, businesses and services which operate...

Popular Categories